Labor Notes: Forty Years of Troublemaking
Everyone knows organized labor is on the decline. And yet bright spots keep flaring up.
Verizon workers in 2016 walked out on the biggest strike in years, proving that corporate giants can still be beaten with old-fashioned solidarity.
Chicago teachers struck in 2012, touching off a wave of teacher militancy that’s still washing over the U.S. Now all eyes are on Los Angeles.
Even in unions where the top leaders are in bed with the bosses, you’ll find members with the spirit to fight back—like the workers at Chrysler who rejected a two-tier contract in 2015 and sent their bargainers back for more, or the Teamster pensioners who blocked their retirement fund from cutting pensions in half.
What unites these workers and many more—from campus and hospital workers who recently struck the whole University of California system to halt the erosion of jobs for Black workers, to four supermarket workers who protested an unfair write-up with a mini-march on the boss? They’re part of what we at Labor Notes call the troublemaking wing of the labor movement.
These sparks aren’t isolated. Workers are helping to inspire, train, and sustain one another. That’s what Labor Notes is all about.
THAT WAS THE PLAN
Helping to cultivate more troublemakers, and to put them in touch with each other to multiply their power, is what Labor Notes set out to do 40 years ago.
That’s what happens at our biennial conferences and our local Troublemakers Schools, and when people read our magazine and website.
Folks from different unions see themselves in their union sisters’ and brothers’ faces. They learn they’re fighting the same boss tactics, they learn some methods for confronting them, they learn we have more in common than we knew.
Elsewhere in the labor movement, union networking is often monopolized by leaders and staff. Connections made through Labor Notes, if we may brag a little, are some of the glue that keeps rank-and-file members talking across locals and across unions, learning from each other how to find the boss’s weak spots, and believing that change is possible.
We’ve gotten a little pushback over the years from those who say, “It’s the boss who makes trouble, we are the constructive ones.” Mostly, though, folks are already used to being called “troublemaker” by the boss (and sometimes by their union officers too). They’re proud to take management’s epithet and turn it around. Our Troublemakers Union T-shirt, emblazoned with a slingshot, was instantly popular.
COMPARE TO LOW-LIERS
Not everyone in the labor movement is in this troublemaking wing. We’re still outnumbered by the “lie low” wing of labor, which says troublemaking is too risky in an era of union weakness.
Everyone is cheering for the Los Angeles teachers now. But what they did is very different from how most unions operate.
In the years leading up to the strike, rank-and-file teachers had to transform their union and oust incumbents who represented the more common point of view—that it was impossible to stop the spread of charter schools, make the district bargain over class size, get members involved in a contract fight, or win a strike.
So who exactly are the troublemakers? They are the folks:
- Who know that partnership with a back-stabbing partner doesn’t work; we have to fight management for every scrap we can get. (Compare to preemptive concessions—“It could have been worse!”)
- Who defend our conditions against concessions and austerity. Think of the UPS workers and auto workers who challenged their national leaders on two-tier. (Compare to “You’re lucky to have a job.”)
- Who organize fellow workers to stand up on the job, to make the work day a little less hard to take. Virginia bus drivers picketed, marched, set a strike deadline, and won bathroom breaks so they wouldn’t have to pee in a bottle. (Compare to “It’s the members’ own fault; they never come to union meetings.”)
- Who are willing to take direct action. West Virginia teachers showed how to do it in a right-to-work state with no legal right to strike. (Compare to “Nobody wins a strike.”)
- Who know politicians will listen when members act up. Those West Virginia teachers made the legislature pass a 5 percent raise for all public employees. (Compare to “Give to the political fund so our lobbyists can solve the problem.”)
- Who fight for internal democracy in unions and will run to replace complacent leaders when needed. Teamsters in north Texas won office after leading a “vote no” movement against two-tier at UPS. (Compare to “Who do you think you are?”)
- Who care about not just the “progressive” positions leaders may have taken but whether members themselves are organized and active. Chicago teachers built a structure in every school so more members could be the union, and they teamed up with parents to fight school closings. (Compare to “I’m on the board of x, y and z social justice nonprofit!”)
- Who want their unions to fight the boss’s divisive tactics, like hiring Black workers only into the lowest jobs, or turning a blind eye to sexual harassment. University service workers in California—the whole union—struck to get management to stop discriminating against Black members. (Compare to “I’ve got mine, Jack.”)
- Who want a better world for everyone, not just union members. (Compare to “The union is your insurance policy.”)
- Who know that even the best troublemakers often fight and lose, but when we fight smart, we build a foundation for the next battle. (Compare to “We can’t take the risk!”)
- Who plan for a world where the lowly workers—that’s us—could be in charge. Who educate themselves about who our enemies are, who they aren’t (like workers from other countries), and how the bad guys have held onto power all these years though we outnumber them.
- Who connect the union to their deepest-held values, and feel other workers’ fights as their own.
- Who don’t just complain—who are in the trenches making the union work every day.
- Who want to put the movement back in the labor movement.
The Labor Notes mindset says that working people are in charge of our own fate—and that we’re up to the task. It says fights in the workplace, where everyone can be involved, teach us that we do have power, and give us practice in the organizing it will take to change the balance of power beyond the workplace, in society.
After the Supreme Court’s Janus decision made the whole public sector open-shop, lots of union leaders, trying to convince members to stick around, used arguments about what the union “provides” to them. But anything a union “provides” can be taken away, as we’ve seen.
On the other hand, if members experience for themselves the power they can wield by acting together with their co-workers—no boss can argue away that feeling. When the union is real in the day to day, members will pay dues to keep it.
KICKING ASS FOR THE WORKING CLASS
Over four decades Labor Notes has reported on a raft of defiant fights in the labor movement, some winners, some losers: the outpouring of solidarity for the striking air traffic controllers, the Hormel strikers who disobeyed their International on concessions, the victory of Ron Carey as Teamsters president, the UPS strike of 1997, the million people in the streets for immigrant rights on May Day 2006, the occupation of the Republic Windows and Doors factory, the Wisconsin uprising of 2011, longshore workers in Washington dumping 10,000 tons of scab grain on the railroad tracks, the 2016 Verizon strike, the teacher strikes that began in Chicago in 2012 and have picked up many-fold over the past year.
We’ve held 19 national conferences and scores of local ones. We’ve given classes and published books that taught countless members the tactics they needed. Our conferences have seen the founding of many national networks, and local ones too.
Recently every national conference is bigger than the last—last year we topped 3,000—which at first blush seems odd. Why is the Labor Notes network growing while the labor movement as a whole is losing power and numbers?
But it makes sense that as employers and governments have stepped up their attacks on workers, more troublemakers have stepped up to join the fight. More and more people are seeing what you see—that a movement with a troublemaking spirit is the only kind with a chance to win.
Frankly, it will take large-scale bravery on the part of a whole lot more troublemakers to reverse the giant mess capitalism has made of everything—the poor getting poorer, our planet on the verge of eco-catastrophe. We’ll be around to help out, if it takes another 40 years!