<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://labornotes.org">
<channel>
 <title>Labor Notes - politics</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Unions Talk Race as Election Nears</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1923</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Jane Slaughter
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Labor leaders who want desperately to chase the Republicans from the White House are confronting a hurdle in their outreach to members: the question of race. Obama’s record on economic issues, they say, should put him way ahead of John McCain with working-class voters. But will the facts be enough to overcome some members’ deep-seated prejudice?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/120">race</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:41:37 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Day 2 - Anna Burger, Politics and Accountability</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1722</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today was Anna Burger&#039;s day in the spotlight. Her stump speech was about the 2008 elections, and why politics was so important to SEIU&#039;s future. Burger, who heads up Change to Win, is apparently the czar of SEIU&#039;s political operations, and it was nice to hear her say, &quot;There is no question that organizing and politics go hand and hand,&quot; acknowledging the link between SEIU&#039;s growth and their work in the political arena.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But inside SEIU&#039;s world, what is cause and what is effect? Right before she uttered those words Burger said, &quot;Make no mistake--our political strength is a direct result of the one million new members who have joined our union since 1996.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seems to me the reverse is more true, that SEIU&#039;s rapid growth is the result of their political operations (savvy, more than strong, I would argue).  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/55">SEIU</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 00:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Labor’s Political Game Falls Short Without Pressure From Below</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1508</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Chris Kutalik
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;The noise, exhilaration, and sheer drama of horse races don’t lend themselves to sober reflection. As the political fortunes of the Bush administration have waned, many labor activists have been on their feet with excitement, watching the wide-open presidential primary contest unfold.  But serious questions remain. . . .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/87">election</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:21:51 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Help Mexico Teach North Carolina About Unions</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1445</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-3&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-4&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Body:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;North Carolina is under new scrutiny for its poor labor standards, this time from a foreign government. Under a side accord in NAFTA called the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation, the Mexican government is challenging the state to implement collective bargaining rights for public sector workers. It has also requested a progress report on a recent inquiry by the International Labor Organization (ILO) into the state’s prohibition against bargaining.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Earlier this year, the ILO ruled that North Carolina’s failure to comply with “freedom of association principles...has resulted in grievous working conditions for many public sector workers.” It called on the U.S. to ratify and adhere to the ILO’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, which includes collective bargaining.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-timestamp-16&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Expiration Date:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Mon, 12/31/2007 - 10:59pm
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/12">Solidarity Network</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/85">international solidarity</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/57">Mexico</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/110">public sector</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/88">union democracy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:13:35 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pakistan’s Union Activists Face Death Penalty</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1444</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-3&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-4&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Body:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Thousands of Pakistani citizens have been arrested for joining widespread protests against the declaration of emergency rule in Pakistan. When President Pervez Musharraf suspended the constitution, fired supreme court judges, and enacted martial law in early November, crackdowns on labor ensued as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Two days after the decree, outspoken union leader Rana Ayub Aki was arrested and jailed. Aki is the leader of the 130,000-strong union inside the Pakistani Water and Development Authority. In the wake of these crackdowns, many labor leaders are being forced into hiding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Union members and other activists organized a protest in early November at the Karachi Press Club, where police violently disrupted the gathering and arrested journalists, lawyers, and two labor leaders. One, Liaqat Ali Sahi, a leader at the State Bank of Pakistan and in the Hotel Workers Solidarity Committee, has been charged with treason for calling for the return of democracy at the November 5 rally. Musharraf’s emergency rule has given military courts the power to try civilians, and Sahi and three others face the death penalty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-timestamp-16&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Expiration Date:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Mon, 12/31/2007 - 10:59pm
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/12">Solidarity Network</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/65">Asia</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/85">international solidarity</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/100">war</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:10:54 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Top 10 Things Heard in the White House after the November 5 elections</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1771</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 According to the AFL-CIO 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;10. &quot;Social Security to be replaced by giant Bingo game -- brought to you by Wall Street.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/148">AFL-CIO</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/87">election</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:29:11 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>GOP Election Victory Opens Door for Intensified Anti-Worker Offensive</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1766</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Justin Jackson and Chris Kutalik
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;This fall the AFL-CIO kicked its election strategy into full gear. Promising “No More Business As Usual” for candidates who refused to embrace labor’s issues, the federation committed massive amounts of cash and manpower to mostly Democratic Party candidates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That support failed to push the Democrats to victory on Election Day. Reports from Washington indicate that GOP leaders are planning new attacks on unions and a revival of old anti-labor legislative assaults either delayed or partially implemented in the past decade. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/148">AFL-CIO</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/87">election</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/142">legislation and politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:03:54 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What If Citizens Got To Decide the City Budget? Brazil’s Workers Party Tries &quot;Participatory Budgeting&quot;</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1217</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Micah Maidenberg
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Brazil will vote for a new president October 6. If the Workers Party (or PT, for Partido dos Trabahadores) wins, South America’s largest country will be governed by a party that was created by the labor movement and dedicated to building movements of workers and the poor...
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/58">Brazil</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/87">election</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/66">international</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/142">legislation and politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/88">union democracy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2002 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Politically-Connected Businessman Profits from ‘Guest Worker’ Program Braceros in Detroit?</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1211</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Elena Herrada 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 We should never be surprised by what campaign contributions and political connections can accomplish. In Detroit, they allowed a company to fire union workers and replace them with immigrants brought into this country under false pretenses-and then subject the new workers to horrible living conditions...
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/93">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/90">immigrant workers</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/142">legislation and politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/120">race</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/55">SEIU</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2002 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Steward&#039;s Corner: How Our Local Bonded With The Community</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1383</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 by Ken Riley; President ILA Local 1422, Charleston, South Carolina
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;For a long time our local union was a sleeping giant in the community. Other groups solicited us only for our funds and not for our involvement. We were also losing ground in contract negotiations: Charleston is a major port, and we weren&#039;t taking advantage of that fact to address issues that were particular to Charleston.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/63">Canada</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/87">election</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/68">ILA</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/97">organizing</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/120">race</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/88">union democracy</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Do We Talk about Terrorism and War?</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1324</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 by Cathy Austin
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;In my workplace, discussions about the war in Afghanistan vary from comments that acknowledge the complexities and causes of this war to &quot;bomb the shit out of them&quot; to no opinion at all. Our members for the most part are reluctant to talk about sensitive issues at work because they want to protect the long-term relationships that we have with each other. The employer already divides us along many lines; care needs to be taken in discussing this issue, as we want to come together, not further divide ourselves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/90">immigrant workers</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/59">Trade</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/88">union democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/79">UNITE-HERE</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/100">war</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New York District Attorney Investigates SEIU Local 32B-J Staff &quot;Volunteering&quot; on Mark Green Campaign</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1325</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 by Freda Coodin
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;On November 13 the Manhattan District Attorney subpoenaed the Service Employees International Union Local 32B-J to hand over documents, after the DA was notified of possible violations by a member and dissident leader, Paul Pamias.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/118">black workers</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/93">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/87">election</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/55">SEIU</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/88">union democracy</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Employers Livid About Anti-Spying Law Passed by Republican Congress</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1362</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 by Robert M. Schwartz
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Irony of ironies: U.S. employers are raging apoplectic about a law enacted by a Republican Congress! Only recently publicized, an amendment to the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act prohibits employers from commissioning professional investigators to conduct secret investigations of employees.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2000 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Immigrants Find High-Tech Servitude in Silicon Valley</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1363</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 by David Bacon
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;When Kim Singh left India to become a contract worker in Silicon Valley, he thought he would find a good job in the electronics industry. Instead, he found a high-tech sweatshop.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/106">AFA</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/118">black workers</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/90">immigrant workers</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/66">international</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/114">outsourcing</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/103">technology</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2000 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Auto Workers Sanctioned Over Raiding Charges</title>
 <link>http://labornotes.org/node/1364</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-2&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textfield-11&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Author(s):&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 by Marsha Niemeijer
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-15&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;A dispute over which union will represent 30,000 Ontario health care workers is threatening to split the Canadian labor movement. The Canadian Labour Congress has imposed far-reaching sanctions on the Canadian Auto Workers, following accusations that the CAW had attempted to raid eight Ontario locals of the Service Employees International Union. The CLC stripped CAW delegates of the right to vote in district labor councils, provincial labor federations, and other CLC bodies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-checkbox-18&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Available Online:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Yes
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/50">auto</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/63">Canada</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/66">international</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/11">Magazine Article</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/102">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://labornotes.org/taxonomy/term/88">union democracy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2000 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
